Daily court lists can be found at the Lawfoundation website:
http://www.lawfoundation.net.au/courtlists
1300 00 2088
Mosman Lawyers
Daily court lists can be found at the Lawfoundation website:
http://www.lawfoundation.net.au/courtlists
1300 00 2088
ON 2 JULY 1890, the US Sherman Antitrust Act was passed by US Congress.
http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=51
The Act prohibited monopolies and cartels and regulated market activities with the aim of preventing anti-competitive conduct.
1300 00 2088
ON 2 JULY 1964, the US Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed into law.
http://www.congresslink.org/print_basics_histmats_civilrights64text.htm
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
The NSW Local Court http://www.localcourt.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/localcourts/index.html has jurisdiction to deal with:
The Local Court is presided over by Magistrates (addressed as “your honour”) who delegate some of their functions to Registrars (“Registrar”).
The Local Court has specialist jurisdictions including:
The Local Court are situated all across the state. In Sydney it is located at:
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
ON 2 JULY 2007, smoking was banned in all enclosed areas of bars through the commencement of the Smoke-free Environment Amendment Act 2004, which amended the Smoke-free Environment Act 2000.
Click to access seaa2004n110354.pdf
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/sea2000247/
1300 00 2088
ON 1 JULY 2014, the Supreme Court of NSW delivered Lafiatis BHT NSW Trustee & Guardian v Australian-Greek Investments Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 884.
http://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/action/PJUDG?jgmtid=172455
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
ON 1 JULY 2013, the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) commenced.
The object of the Act is to consolidate the provisions of the numerous NSW road transport Acts into the one Act.
1300 00 2088
ON 1 JULY 1914, the House of Lords delivered Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79; [1914] UKHL 1 (1 July 1914).
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1914/1.html
Liquidated sum clauses are valid and enforceable under contract law; penalty clauses are not. A liquidated sum is a genuine estimate of the losses from a breach; a penalty frightens or deters a party from breach.
A court will construe a clause to be a penalty if:
A court will presume a clause to be a penalty if it is for a single lump sum payable in the occurrence of one or multiple events, some of which may only warrant minimal damages.
A court will presume a clause to be liquidated if the consequences of a breach are hard or impossible to estimate as it is probable that the pre-estimated damage was the true bargain between the parties.
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
ON 1 JULY 1983, the High Court of Australia delivered Commonwealth v Tasmania (“Tasmanian Dam case”) [1983] HCA 21; (1983) 158 CLR 1 (1 July 1983).
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1983/21.html
The Tasmanian Government, who sought to construct a hydro-electric dam on the Franklin River, brought a constitutional challenge to the Commonwealth’s World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983 on various grounds including that the Commonwealth had no power to legislate on such a matter.
The challenge was unsuccessful. The court ruled that the Act was validly enacted under the Commonwealth’s external affairs power under s51 of the Constitution as it gave effect to their international treaty obligations under the Convention on the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage.
As a result of this decision, the construction of a hydro-electric dam in Tasmania’s Franklin River was blocked.
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
ON 1 JULY 2014, the Fair Work Commission launched an updated pro bono program in Melbourne. Unrepresented parties in unfair dismissal jurisdictional objection matters will be provided with a free session with a volunteer lawyer in the weeks before their hearing.
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088