Tag Archives: Mosman Lawyers

Mosman Lawyers

Somerset v Stuart

ON 22 JUNE 1772, the English King’s Bench delivered Somerset v Stuart (1772) Lofft 1; (1772) 98 ER 499.

Even though African slavery was tolerated at the time in the colonies, the court ruled that a slave could not be taken by force and sold abroad as property as no such right existed under the law of England,

Lawyer
Peter O’Grady
BA, LLB, Grad Cert Leg Prac, Acc Spec Lawyer

Statute of Anne 1710

ON THIS DAY in 1710, the Parliament of Great Britain passed the Statute of Anne 1710.  The Act introduced government regulation of copyright, modernising the law and abolishing private regulation that had operated under the Licensing Act 1662.

 

Act of Settlement 1701

ON 12 JUNE 1701, the English Parliament enacted the Act of Settlement.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Will3/12-13/2/contents

Lawyer
Peter O’Grady
BA, LLB, Grad Cert Leg Prac, Acc Spec Lawyer

1688 | Bill of Rights

ON THIS DAY in 1689, the Bill of Rights was passed into law by the Parliament of England.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2

Statute of Frauds 1677

ON 16 APRIL 1677, the English Parliament enacted the Statute of Frauds 1677.

This Act required certain dealings with real property, sale of goods, estates, trusts and marriage be reduced to writing and signed in order to avoid fraud or perjury.

The provisions of the Act have since been incorporated into many pieces of legislation around the common law world.

 

Thomas Bonham v College of Physicians (“Dr Bonham’s case”) 8 Co Rep 107a; 77 Eng Rep 638

ON 1 DECEMBER 1610, the Chief Justice of the English Court of Common Pleas, Sir Edward Coke, delivered Thomas Bonham v College of Physicians 8 Co Rep 107a; 77 Eng Rep 638.

Dr Bonham had been fined and imprisoned by the Royal College of Physicians for continuing to practise as a Physician in London. He brought a case for false imprisonment.

Coke CJ held that Charter granted by the Parliament to the College of Surgeons was invalid due to bias.

Coke CJ at 118a ruled:

“The censors cannot be judges, ministers, and parties; judges to give
sentence or judgment; ministers to make summons; and parties to have the
moiety of the forfeiture…”

Coke CJ at 118a said:

“It appears in our books that in many cases the common law will control acts of Parliament and sometimes adjudge them to be utterly void; for when an Act of Parliament is against common right and reason, or repugnant, or impossible to be performed, the common law will control it and adjudge such an act to be void.”

The case establishes the rule against bias as a constitutional limit on the exercise of parliament’s legislative powers. In short, (1) a person may not be a judge in their own case and (2) an Act of Parliament is invalid if it conflicts with a basic principle of the common law (such as that a person may not be a judge in their own case).

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Walsingham’s Case [1573] EWHC KB

ON 11 JANUARY 1573, the King’s Bench delivered Walsingham’s Case [1573] EWHC KB (11 January 1573).

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1573/J99.html

This case characterised a fee simple estate in land to be “time in the land without end, or the land for the time without end”; and a fee tail estate to be “time in the land or the land for time as long as he has issues [heirs] of his body”.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Observance of Due Process Law 1368

ON THIS DAY in 1368, the Parliament of England passed the Observance of Due Process Law 1368.

A person must be brought before the law with due process and anything done to the contrary is void and in error.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw3/42/3/section/III?view=extent