Category Archives: Criminal Procedure

Festa v R [2001] HCA 72

ON 13 DECEMBER 2001, the High Court of Australia delivered Festa v R [2001] HCA 72; 208 CLR 593; 185 ALR 394; 76 ALJR 291 (13 December 2001).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/2001/72.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Adam v R [2001] HCA 57

ON 11 OCTOBER 2001, the High Court of Australia delivered Adam v R [2001] HCA 57; 207 CLR 96; 183 ALR 625; 75 ALJR 1537 (11 October 2001).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/2001/57.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Stanoevski v R [2001] HCA 4

ON 8 FEBRUARY 2001, the High Court of Australia delivered Stanoevski v R [2001] HCA 4; 202 CLR 115; 177 ALR 285; 75 ALJR 454 (8 February 2001).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/2001/4.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Crampton v R [2000] HCA 60

ON 23 NOVEMBER 2000, the High Court of Australia delivered Crampton v R [2000] HCA 60; 206 CLR 161; 176 ALR 369; 75 ALJR 133 (23 November 2000).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2000/60.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

R v Atm [2000] NSWCCA 475

ON 24 NOVEMBER 2000, the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal delivered R v Atm [2000] NSWCCA 475 (24 November 2000).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWCCA/2000/475.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

R v OGD (No 2) [2000] NSWCCA 404

ON 13 OCTOBER 2000, the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal delivered R v OGD (No 2) [2000] NSWCCA 404 (13 October 2000).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWCCA/2000/404.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54

ON 12 OCTOBER 2000, the High Court of Australia delivered Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321; 175 ALR 315; 74 ALJR 1538 (12 October 2000).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2000/54.html

An appellate court may not disturb a sentence just because it disagrees with the sentence imposed. Error must be identified in terms of the principles explained by the High Court in House v R.

Sentencing errors may be identified in terms of the invocation of incorrect principle; giving weight to extraneous or irrelevant matter; failing to give weight to material considerations; or making a factual mistake. Sentencing errors may also be inferred from the result being manifestly unreasonable or plainly wrong.

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

R v Glasby [2000] NSWCCA 83

ON 22 JUNE 2000, the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal delivered R v Glasby [2000] NSWCCA 83 (22 June 2000).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWCCA/2000/83.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Zoneff v R [2000] HCA 28

ON 25 MAY 2000, the High Court of Australia delivered Zoneff v R [2000] HCA 28; 200 CLR 234; 172 ALR 1; 74 ALJR 895 (25 May 2000).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2000/28.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Bull v R [2000] HCA 24

ON 11 MAY 2000, the High Court of Australia delivered Bull v R [2000] HCA 24; 201 CLR 443; 110 A Crim R 562; 171 ALR 613 (11 May 2000).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/2000/24.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088