Tag Archives: SYDNEY SOLICITOR

1989 | ICAC came into being

ON THIS DAY in 1989, The NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption came into being.

Walton v R [1989] HCA 9

ON 9 FEBRUARY 1989, the High Court of Australia delivered Walton v R [1989] HCA 9; (1989) 166 CLR 283 (9 February 1989).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/166clr283.html

Lawyers

1300 00 2088

Queensland Wire Industries Pty Ltd v Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited [1989] HCA 6

Queensland Wire Industries Pty Ltd v Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited [1989] HCA 6; (1989) 167 CLR 177 (8 February 1989).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/167clr177.html

Lawyers

1300 00 2088

M v M [1988] HCA 68

M v M [1988] HCA 68; (1988) 166 CLR 69; (1988) 82 ALR 577; (1988) 63 ALJR 108 (8 December 1988).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1988/68.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Berckelman v Mosman Municipal Council [1988] NSLEC 88

Berckelman v Mosman Municipal Council [1988] NSWLEC 88 (11 November 1988).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/1988/88.html

Lawyers

1300 00 2088

Hoch v R [1998] HCA 50

ON 5 OCTOBER 1988, the High Court of Australia delivered Hoch v R [1988] HCA 50; (1988) 165 CLR 292 (5 October 1988).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/165clr292.html

Propensity evidence should be rejected if there is a reasonable possibility of concoction.

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Chamberlain acquittal

ON 15 SEPTEMBER 1988, Michael and Lindy Chamberlain were acquitted by the Northern Territory Court of Criminal Appeal, who quashed their earlier convictions.

Click to access 3.pdf

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd [1998] HCA 44

ON 8 SEPTEMBER 1988, the High Court of Australia delivered Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd [1988] HCA 44; (1988) 165 CLR 107 (8 September 1988).

The proprietor of a building site (Blue Circle Cement) took out an insurance policy with Trident General Insurance which promised to indemnify the assured who it defined as Blue Circle Cement but also “all its subsidiary, associated and related Companies, all Contractors and Sub-Contractors and/or Suppliers”.

A contractor (McNeice) who incurred a legal liability (a judgment in favour of an injured worker) was held to be covered although not a party to the policy.

A non-party beneficiary under an insurance policy has a right at common law for benefits promised under the policy. The decision creates an exception to the privity of contract rule.

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth)

ON 1 JULY 1998, the substantive provisions of the Commonwealth Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 commenced. The Act was initially called the Commonwealth Employees’ Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/sraca1988368/

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Company Inc v Fay [1998] HCA 32

ON 30 JUNE 1988, the High Court of Australia delivered Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Company Inc v Fay [1988] HCA 32; (1988) 165 CLR 197 (30 June 1988).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1988/32.html

The court found that a contract of carriage was made in Australia at the time of payment and that terms and conditions printed on a ticket later issued in Greece had no effect and could not alter what was already agreed in Australia.

The court held that in a contract of carriage:

  • a condition printed on a ticket has no effect to alter the contract if the ticket is issued after making the contract
  • an exemption clause (excluding liability of loss) on a ticket has no effect unless the carrier does all that is reasonably necessary to bring the clause to the passenger’s notice.

The court also held that when a defendant applies for a stay or dismissal of proceedings on the grounds of forum non conveniens (forum not appropriate), it must persuade the local court that the plaintiff’s claim should be brought in another court because the local court is a clearly inappropriate forum to determine the dispute.

Lawyers 1300 00 2088