Tag Archives: PERSONAL INJURY

Cullen v Trappell [1980] HCA 10

ON 1 MAY 1980, the High Court of Australia delivered Cullen v Trappell [1980] HCA 10; (1980) 146 CLR 1 (1 May 1980).

“Damages – Negligence – Personal injuries – Effect of taxation liability on quantum of damages – Whether damages should be reduced by tax plaintiff would have paid in respect of earnings if he had not been injured – Gourley principle.
Practice (N.S.W.) – Judgment – Interest – Damages for personal injuries – Damages for economic loss up to date of judgment – Damages for other than economic loss – Discretion – Supreme Court Act, 1970 (N.S.W.), s. 94 (1).”

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1980/10.html

The court overruled the earlier High Court decision of Atlas Tiles Ltd v Briers (1978) 144 CLR 202 and affirmed the rule in British Transport Commission v Gourley [1956] AC 185.

Damages are to compensate the plaintiff for the loss suffered, no more or no less. If the damages are taxable income, allowance should be made for this by an award of the gross sum.  If the damages are not taxable, the award should be reduced by any tax the plaintiff would have been required to pay. If the plaintiff is entitled to a tax deduction as a result of the loss, an allowance should be made in the award.

In a claim for personal injuries damages, a court must assess the plaintiff’s pre-injury earning capacity with regards to their net income after tax.  An assessment involving gross income would result in over-compensation.

Interest on past continuing losses is not to be paid at the full rate for the whole period as this would lead to over-compensation. Instead, interest is to be paid at half the rate over the full period or at the full rate over half the period so as to take into account the gradual way in which interest accrues. The awarding of interest is a discretionary matter that must be approached in a “broad and practical way”.

Lawyers

1300 00 2088

Wyong Shire Council v Shirt [1980] HCA 12

ON THIS DAY in 1980, the High Court of Australia delivered Wyong Shire Council v Shirt [1980] HCA 12; (1980) 146 CLR 40 (1 May 1980).

“Negligence – Duty of care – Breach of duty – Foreseeability of risk of injury – Likelihood of harm occurring – Erection of sign “deep water” in vicinity of shallow water – Whether foreseeable that inexperienced water-skier would fall and suffer injury.”

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1980/12.html

Mason J at p48 expressed the “risk calculus”, that when deciding on a breach of duty of care, the court must not only determine a foreseeable risk but it must also determine a reasonable man’s response by “consideration of the magnitude of the risk and the degree of probability of its occurrence, along with the expense, difficulty and inconvenience of taking alleviating action and any other conflicting responsibilities which the defendant may have”.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Mcdonald’S System of Australia Pty Ltd v Mcwilliam’S Wines Pty Ltd (No 2) [1979] FCA 109

Mcdonald’S System of Australia Pty Ltd v Mcwilliam’S Wines Pty Ltd (No 2) [1979] FCA 109; (1979) 41 FLR 436 (21 December 1979).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/1979/109.html

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/poteoa1997455

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW)

ON 21 DECEMBER 1979, the NSW Parliament enacted the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/epaaa1979389/notes.html

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/poteoa1997455

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

McInnis v R [1979] HCA 65

ON THIS DAY in 1979, the High Court of Australia delivered McInnis v R [1979] HCA 65; (1979) 143 CLR 575 (19 December 1979) .

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1979/65.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Gronow v Gronow [1979] HCA 63

Gronow v Gronow [1979] HCA 63; (1979) 144 CLR 513 (14 December 1979).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1979/63.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd

ON 12 OCTOBER 1979, the High Court of Australia delivered Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd [1979] HCA 51; (1979) 144 CLR 596 (12 October 1979).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1979/51.html

Lawyer
Peter O’Grady
BA, LLB, Grad Cert Leg Prac, Acc Spec Lawyer

State Government Insurance Commission v Trigwell [1979] HCA 40

ON 19 SEPTEMBER 1979, the High Court of Australia delivered State Government Insurance Commission v Trigwell [1979] HCA 40; (1979) 142 CLR 617 (19 September 1979).

The High Court confirmed the English common law rule of Searle v Wallbank “that the owner or occupier of a property adjoining the highway is under no legal obligation to users of it so to keep and maintain his hedges, fences and gates as to prevent animals from straying on to it, and that he is not under any duty as between himself and users of it to take reasonable care to prevent any of his animals, not known to be dangerous, from straying on to it” (at 631).

Since this decision, State legislatures have passed laws to make farmers liable for the actions of their animals.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Sydney Lawyers

PERSONAL INJURY. ON 19 SEPTEMBER 1979, the High Court of Australia delivered State Government Insurance Commission v Trigwell [1979] HCA 40; (1979) 142 CLR 617 (19 September 1979).

The High Court confirmed the English common law rule of Searle v Wallbank “that the owner or occupier of a property adjoining the highway is under no legal obligation to users of it so to keep and maintain his hedges, fences and gates as to prevent animals from straying on to it, and that he is not under any duty as between himself and users of it to take reasonable care to prevent any of his animals, not known to be dangerous, from straying on to it” (at 631).

Since this decision, State legislatures have passed laws to make farmers liable for the actions of their animals.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Taylor v Taylor [1979] HCA 38

ON 22 AUGUST 1979, the High Court of Australia delivered Taylor v Taylor [1979] HCA 38; (1979) 143 CLR 1 (22 August 1979).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1979/38.html

A husband failed to appear in family law proceedings in the Supreme Court of NSW due to a misunderstanding on the part of his legal representative. In his absence, the court made orders dissolving the marriage and transferring the matrimonial home to the wife. Once the husband became aware of the orders, he made an application to the newly established Family Court seeking variation of the Supreme Court orders to the effect that the matrimonial home be sold and the net proceeds be divided between he and his wife. On the day of the application, the wife’s legal representatives mistakenly attended the Family Law Division of the Supreme Court rather than the Family Court. In the absence of the wife, orders were made by Hogan J of the Family Court in accordance with the relief sought by the husband. The wife then appealed to the Full Court of the Family Court, who allowed the appeal ruling that Hogan J did not possess the statutory power to amend the Supreme Court’s orders.

The High Court allowed an appeal, ordering that the previous orders be set aside and that there be a re-hearing of the matter.

The High Court held that a court has an inherent jurisdiction to set aside orders where it is in the interests of justice to do so.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088