Tag Archives: FIND A LAWYER

Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon [1993] HCA 4 | 10 February 1993

ON THIS DAY IN 1993, the High Court of Australia delivered Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon [1993] HCA 4; (1993) 176 CLR 344; (1993) 111 ALR 289; (1993) 67 ALJR 228 (10 February 1993).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1993/4.html

As an exception to the rule that damages are not available for mental distress and disappointment arising from a breach of contract, such damages may be awarded if the contract in question contemplated the delivery of enjoyment, relaxation or peace of mind.

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited v Laurie [2011] HCA 2 | 9 February 2011

ON 9 FEBRUARY 2011, the High Court of Australia delivered British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited v Laurie [2011] HCA 2 (9 February 2011).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2011/2.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission; Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Childs) [2010] HCA 1 | 3 FEBRUARY 2010

ON THIS DAY IN 2010, the High Court of Australia delivered Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission; Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Childs) [2010] HCA 1 (3 February 2010).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2010/1.html

Kirk was charged for offences under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 (NSW). The statement of offence did not identify the acts or omissions that constituted the alleged offences.

The charges were heard by the NSW Industrial Court. During the hearing the prosecution called Kirk as a witness for the prosecution.

Kirk was convicted and sentenced.

Kirk appealed to the NSW Court of Appeal seeking an order in the nature of certiorari on the grounds that there was a jurisdictional error. Kirk argued that the Industrial Court exceeded its jurisdiction in two ways: (1) the statement of offence did not identify the acts of omissions that constituted the alleged offences, nor the measures available to address the risks, so the defendant was denied an opportunity to properly defend the charges and (2) that under s17(2) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), a defendant is not competent to give evidence for the prosecution and the trial was therefore conducted otherwise than in accordance with the laws of evidence. The NSW Court of Appeal refused to quash the convictions and sentences on the grounds that s179 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) prohibits an appeal against a review, quashing or calling into question a decision of the Industrial Court.

The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Court of Appeal’s decision and quashed the convictions and sentences. In overturning the Court of Appeal, High Court held that (1) the a “decision” does not include a decision made by the Industrial Court outside of their jurisdiction and (2) it was beyond the power of the State legislature to limit the power of a State Supreme Court to grant relief to correct jurisdictional errors made by courts and tribunals of limited jurisdiction.

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Liquor (Amendment) Act 1954 (NSW)

ON THIS DAY IN 1955, the “six o’clock swill” was abolished by the NSW Liquor (Amendment) Act 1954.

Click to access la1954n50214.pdf

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Mosman Local Environmental Plan 2012

ON THIS DAY IN 2012, the Mosman Local Environmental Plan 2012 commenced.

Click to access mlep20122011647295.pdf

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Innes v Rail Corporation of NSW (No 2) [2013] FMCA 36

ON THIS DAY IN 2013, the Federal Magistrates Court delivered Innes v Rail Corporation of NSW (No 2) [2013] FMCA 36 (1 February 2013).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FMCA/2013/36.html

The Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Commissioner successfully sued the Rail Corporation of NSW on the grounds that it failed to provide audible train announcements for the hearing impaired.

Lawyers

1300 00 2088

New Alcohol Interlock Laws

From 1 FEBRUARY 2015, new drink driving laws come into effect. It will be mandatory for courts to order drivers convicted of high range, repeat and other serious drink driving offences with a minimum license disqualification and a minimum 12 month participation in the alcohol interlock program.

For further information go to:

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Look up or check a lawyer

Contact details of lawyers across Australia can be found in the following online directories:

Law Society of NSW

NSW Bar Association

ACT Law Society

ACT Bar Association

http://legalhelpdesksydney.com.au/north-sydney-lawyers/

Law Institute of Victoria

Legal Services Board of Victoria

Victorian Bar Association

Law Society of Tasmania

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Tasmanian Bar Association

Law Society of South Australia

South Australian Bar Association

Legal Practice Board of Western Australia

Law Society of the Northern Territory

Queensland Law Society

North Sydney Lawyers

Bar Association of Queensland

Sydney Lawyers

Artarmon Lawyers

Balgowlah Lawyers

Brookvale Lawyers

Cammeray Lawyers

Chatswood Lawyers

Clontarf Lawyers

Cremorne Lawyers

Crows Nest Lawyers

Dee Why Lawyers

Frenchs Forest Lawyers

Kirribilli Lawyers

Lane CoveLawyers

Lower North Shore Lawyers

Manly Lawyers

Manly Vale Lawyers

Milsons Point Lawyers

Mosman Lawyers

Neutral Bay Lawyers

North Balgowlah Lawyers

North Sydney Lawyers

Northbridge Lawyers

Northern Beaches Lawyers

Seaforth Lawyers

St Leonards Lawyers

Sydney Lawyers

Willoughby Lawyers

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Sons of Gwalia Ltd v Margaretic [2007] HCA 1

ON THIS DAY IN 2007, the High Court of Australia delivered Sons of Gwalia Ltd v Margaretic [2007] HCA 1; (2007) 232 ALR 232; (2007) 81 ALJR 525 (31 January 2007).

Section 563A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provided:

“Payment of a debt owed by a company to a person in the person’s capacity as a member of the company, whether by way of dividends, profits or otherwise, is to be postponed until all debts owed to, or claims made by, persons otherwise than as members of the company have been satisfied.”

The High Court held that s563A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) did not apply to shareholders making a claim for damages for losses suffered as a result of the company’s wrongdoing when acquiring the shares as such claims are not owed to the shareholder in their capacity as a member of the company. Accordingly, a claim by Mr Margaretic for losses arising from being misled in the acquisition of his shares before the company went into administration were to be treated as debts under s553 of the Act and ranked equally with the claims of other creditors.

Parliament has since amended the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by the passage of the Corporations (Sons of Gwalia) Act 2010. In general terms, the effect of the amendment is that (1) share ownership does not preclude a claim against the insolvent company but payment shareholder claims relating to share dealings is to be postponed until the payment of all other debts and (2) a person whose claim has been postponed is entitled to receive documents relating to the insolvency and in some cases, with the permission of the court, vote at meetings regarding the conduct of the administration.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2007/1.html

Lawyers

1300 00 2088

Pyrenees Shire Council v Day [1998] HCA 3 | 23 January 1998

ON 23 January 1998, the High Court of Australia delivered Pyrenees Shire Council v Day [1998] HCA 3; 192 CLR 330; 151 ALR 147; 72 ALJR 152 (23 January 1998).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1998/3.html

The High Court rejected the “doctrine of general reliance” of Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424 (1985) 157 CLR 424.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088