Tag Archives: FIND A LAWYER

Dubow v Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd (No.2) [2012] NSWSC 961

Dubow v Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd (No.2) [2012] NSWSC 961 (24 August 2012)

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Johnson v Angus [2012] NSWLEC 192

Johnson v Angus [2012] NSWLEC 192 (17 August 2012).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/2012/192.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd v Dubow [2012] NSWSC 962

Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd v Dubow [2012] NSWSC 962 (15 August 2012).

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd v Dubow [2012] NSWSC 962

Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd v Dubow [2012] NSWSC 962 (15 August 2012).

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] HCATrans 160

Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] HCATrans 160 (22 June 2012)

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Equal Remuneration Case

ON 22 JUNE 2012, the Full Bench of Fair Work Australia delivered Equal Remuneration Case [2012] FWAFB 5184 (22 June 2012).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FWAFB/2012/5184.html

Ashby v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] FCA 640

Ashby v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] FCA 640 (15 June 2012).

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Neerim Bowral Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2012] NSWLEC 1173

ON 5 JUNE 2012, the NSW Land and Environment Court delivered Neerim Bowral Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2012] NSWLEC 1173 (5 June 2012).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/2012/1173.html

The applicant appealed a decision of North Sydney Council to refuse an application for the modification of a development consent relating to a duplex at 9 Wonga Road, Cremorne.

The court upheld the appeal, allowing for the modification of the consent.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

9 Wonga Road, Cremorne NSW 2090

ON 5 JUNE 2012, the NSW Land and Environment Court delivered Neerim Bowral Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2012] NSWLEC 1173 (5 June 2012).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/2012/1173.html

The applicant appealed a decision of North Sydney Council to refuse an application for the modification of a development consent relating to a duplex at 9 Wonga Road, Cremorne.

The court upheld the appeal, allowing for the modification of the consent.

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

PGA v The Queen

ON 30 MAY 2012, the High Court of Australia delivered PGA v The Queen [2012] HCA 21 (30 May 2012).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2012/21.html

The Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia had held that in 2010, a man could be guilty of raping his wife in 1963. PGA appealed this decision on the grounds that it was not until 1991, when the High Court decided in R v L (1991) 174 CLR 379, could a man be guilty of raping his wife because, up until then the common law in Australia was that pronounced by Sir Matthew Hale in 1736 that upon marriage a wife gave her irrevocable consent to sexual intercourse.

The High Court in PGA v The Queen dismissed the appeal, holding that the marital exemption to rape, if it ever applied in Australia, had ceased to be part of Australian law by 1963 because Australian legislation concerning divorce, voting and property by that time had gone against Hale’s proposition.

Lawyer
Peter O’Grady
BA, LLB, Grad Cert Leg Prac, Acc Spec Lawyer

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨