Tag Archives: FIND A LAWYER

Section 10 of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

ON 12 MARCH 1929, section 10 of the NSW Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (formerly known as section 556A of the Crimes Act 1900) was added to the Crimes Act 1900 through the passage of the Crimes (Amendment) Act 1929 No 2.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/num_act/ca1929n2189

As at 12 March 2015, s10 provides:

Dismissal of charges and conditional discharge of offender
10 Dismissal of charges and conditional discharge of offender

(1) Without proceeding to conviction, a court that finds a person guilty of an offence may make any one of the following orders:
(a) an order directing that the relevant charge be dismissed,
(b) an order discharging the person on condition that the person enter into a good behaviour bond for a term not exceeding 2 years,
(c) an order discharging the person on condition that the person enter into an agreement to participate in an intervention program and to comply with any intervention plan arising out of the program.
(2) An order referred to in subsection (1) (b) may be made if the court is satisfied:
(a) that it is inexpedient to inflict any punishment (other than nominal punishment) on the person, or
(b) that it is expedient to release the person on a good behaviour bond.
(2A) An order referred to in subsection (1) (c) may be made if the court is satisfied that it would reduce the likelihood of the person committing further offences by promoting the treatment or rehabilitation of the person.
(2B) Subsection (1) (c) is subject to Part 8C.
(3) In deciding whether to make an order referred to in subsection (1), the court is to have regard to the following factors:
(a) the person’s character, antecedents, age, health and mental condition,
(b) the trivial nature of the offence,
(c) the extenuating circumstances in which the offence was committed,
(d) any other matter that the court thinks proper to consider.
(4) An order under this section has the same effect as a conviction:
(a) for the purposes of any law with respect to the revesting or restoring of stolen property, and
(b) for the purpose of enabling a court to give directions for compensation under Part 4 of the Victims Compensation Act 1996 , and
(c) for the purpose of enabling a court to give orders with respect to the restitution or delivery of property or the payment of money in connection with the restitution or delivery of property.
(5) A person with respect to whom an order under this section is made has the same right to appeal on the ground that the person is not guilty of the offence as the person would have had if the person had been convicted of the offence.

Lawyers

1300 00 2088

Addie v Dumbreck [1929] UKHL 3

ON THIS DAY in 1929, the House of Lords delivered Robert Addie & Sons (Collieries) Ltd v Dumbreck [1929] AC 358; UKHL 3 (25 February 1929).

http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1929/1929_SC_HL_51.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

1927 | Buck v Bell

ON THIS DAY in 1927, the US Supreme Court delivered Buck v Bell 274 US 200 (1927).

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality a law of the State of Virginia which allowed the sterilisation of “feeble minded” inmates of institutions with “hereditary insanity or imbecility”.

Click to access Buck%20v.%20Bell_%20Supreme%20Court%20Opinion.pdf

Blackadder v Good Roads Machinery Company Incorporated [1926] HCA 57

Blackadder v Good Roads Machinery Company Incorporated [1926] HCA 57; (1926) 38 CLR 332 (20 August 1926).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1926/57.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Webster v Mosman Municipal Council

Webster v Mosman Municipal Council [1926] HCA 11; (1926) 37 CLR 557 (3 May 1926).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1926/11.html

Balmoral Beach

Webster v Mosman Municipal Council [1926] HCA 11; (1926) 37 CLR 557 (3 May 1926).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1926/11.html

Illinois v Leopold & Loeb

ON 10 SEPTEMBER 1924, Nathan Leopold Jr and Richard Loeb were sentenced to 99 years imprisonment after being convicted of attempting to kidnap and murder a 14 year old boy.

Click to access Leopold_Loeb_Sentencing.pdf

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Bailey v Bailey [1924] HCA 21

ON 10 JUNE 1924, the High Court of Australia delivered Bailey v Bailey [1924] HCA 21; (1924) 34 CLR 558 (10 June 1924).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/34clr558.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Lippe Caveator v Hedderwick [1922] HCA 44

ON 24 OCTOBER 1922, the High Court of Australia delivered Lippe Caveator v Hedderwick [1922] HCA 44; (1922) 31 CLR 148 (24 October 1922).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/31clr148.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Toomey’s Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation for NSW and Sydney Ferries Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation for NSW [1922] NSWStRp 37

Toomey’s Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation for NSW and Sydney Ferries Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation for NSW [1922] NSWStRp 37; (1922) 22 SR (NSW) 432 (4 July 1922)

Lawyers 1300 00 2088