Category Archives: Succession

Timbury v Coffee [1941] HCA 22

ON 28 July 1941, the High Court of Australia delivered Timbury v Coffee [1941] HCA 22; (1941) 66 CLR 277 (28 July 1941).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/66clr277.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Birmingham v Renfrew [1937] HCA 52

ON 2 SEPTEMBER 1937, the High Court of Australia delivered Birmingham v Renfrew [1937] HCA 52; (1937) 57 CLR 666 (2 September 1937).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/57clr666.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Levy v Kum Chah [1936] HCA 60

ON 7 DECEMBER 1936, the High Court of Australia delivered Levy v Kum Chah [1936] HCA 60; (1936) 56 CLR 159 (7 December 1936).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/56clr159.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Russell v Scott [1936] HCA 34

ON 12 AUGUST 1936, the High Court of Australia delivered Russell v Scott [1936] HCA 34; (1936) 55 CLR 440 (12 August 1936).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/55clr440.html

Percy Russell and his elderly aunt opened a joint bank account containing funds to be managed by Russell for the benefit of the aunt. Russell made no contributions.

After the death of the aunt, proceedings were instituted by Scott (a beneficiary under the aunt’s will) seeking a declaration that the balance of the account and some funds withdrawn before the aunt’s death belonged to the estate. The trial judge ruled that the balance of the account did not pass to Russell as the benefit was testamentary in nature and had not been made in accordance with the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW).

Russell appealed the trial judge’s decision.

The High Court found an intention by the aunt to confer upon her death, through survivorship, legal and beneficial ownership of the funds to Russell.  The court therefore allowed the appeal, dismissing Scott’s action on the grounds that that the funds in question did not form part of the estate.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Bailey v Bailey [1924] HCA 21

ON 10 JUNE 1924, the High Court of Australia delivered Bailey v Bailey [1924] HCA 21; (1924) 34 CLR 558 (10 June 1924).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/34clr558.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Lippe Caveator v Hedderwick [1922] HCA 44

ON 24 OCTOBER 1922, the High Court of Australia delivered Lippe Caveator v Hedderwick [1922] HCA 44; (1922) 31 CLR 148 (24 October 1922).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/31clr148.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Probate Administration Act 1898 (NSW)

ON 27 JULY 1898, the NSW Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898 was enacted. The Act was renamed the Probate Administration Act 1898 in 2008, with part of the Act becoming the Succession Act 2006.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/paaa1898259

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/sa2006138

Lawyers 1300 00 2088