Category Archives: Personal Injury

Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) | 18 June 2002

ON 18 JUNE 2002, the NSW Civil Liability Act 2002 was enacted.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/cla2002161/

The substantive provisions commenced retrospectively on 20 March 2002. There have been successive amendments, notably those which commenced in December 2002 and 2004 and June 2006.

The Act modifies the Australian common law with respect to civil liability claims in New South Wales, except those set out in s3B.

The Act limits the circumstances in which people may recover damages for civil wrongs and the amount of damages and costs they recover.

The significant features of the Act include:

  • Statement of principles for determining negligence.
  • Modification of causation test.
  • No duty to warn of obvious risk.
  • No liability for materialisation of inherent risk.
  • No liability for harm suffered from obvious risks of dangerous recreational activities.
  • No duty of care for risk warning of dangerous recreational activity.
  • Standard of care for professionals.
  • Contributory negligence can defeat a claim.
  • Fixing damages for economic and non-economic loss, including thresholds, discounts and maximum limits.
  • Limiting interest.
  • Restrictions for persons in custody.
  • Restrictions for mental harm.
  • Allocation of proportionate liability for concurrent wrongdoers.
  • Limiting liability of public authorities.
  • Restricting recovery for intoxicated persons.
  • Exclusion of liability for persons acting in self defence, good Samaritans, food donors or volunteers.
  • Apologies not to affect liability.
  • Limiting damages for birth of a child.
  • Exclusion of liability for trespass or nuisance by ordinary use of aircraft.
  • Costs restrictions.

The Act does not apply to claims (or parts of claims) regarding:

  • Intentional acts with the intent to cause injury or death or sexual assault or other sexual misconduct.
  • Dust diseases.
  • Tobacco.
  • Motor Accidents and public transport accidents.
  • Workers, Victims and Sporting Injuries compensation.

 

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No. 25) [2014] NSWSC 518

ON 23 MAY 2014, the Supreme Court of NSW delivered Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No. 25) [2014] NSWSC 518 (“Scots College case”).

http://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/action/PJUDG?jgmtid=171197

The parents of a deceased schoolboy and a company related to the parents were awarded damages against the boy’s school arising from admitted negligence causing the boy’s drowning on a school hike in 1999.

The court found that the parents suffered mental harm which resolved by June 2001.

The parents were awarded damages which included an amount of $75,000 for their costs associated with the coronial inquest.

The father was awarded $202,486, the mother was awarded $138,887 and both were awarded $95,00 jointly. The associated company was awarded $56,000 with respect to a claim for loss of services (per quod servitium amisit) arising from the inability of the parents to work whilst suffering from the mental harm.

The amount awarded to the company was significantly less than that which the company had sought.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

National Disability Insurance Act 2013 (Cth)

ON THIS DAY in 2013, the National Disability Insurance Act 2013 (Cth) received assent.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ndisa2013341

Lawyers

1300 00 2088

Legal Services Commissioner v Bryden and Hagipantelis (No 2) [2012] NSWADT 112

ON 12 JUNE 2012, the NSW Administrative Decisions Tribunal delivered Legal Services Commissioner v Bryden and Hagipantelis (No 2) [2012] NSWADT 112 (12 June 2012).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWADT/2012/112.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar & Ors [2012] HCA 17

ON THIS DAY in 2012, the High Court of Australia delivered Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar & Ors [2012] HCA 17 (3 May 2012).

The non-executive directors of James Hardie Industries Limited named in these proceedings were held to have breached their duties as directors by approving the release of a misleading announcement to the Australian Stock Exchange regarding the funds to be made available for the payment of asbestos related injury and death claims following a restructure sending the company offshore.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2012/17.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Strong v Woolworths Ltd [2012] HCA 5

ON 7 MARCH 2012, the High Court of Australia delivered Strong v Woolworths Ltd [2012] HCA 5 (7 March 2012).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2012/5.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Miller v Miller [2011] HCA 9

ON 7 APRIL 2011, the High Court of Australia delivered Miller v Miller [2011] HCA 9 (7 April 2011).

A joint illegal enterprise (eg joyride) negates a duty of care (driver to passenger) thereby creating a defence of illegality on the part of the driver/insurer: see Gala v Preston [1991] HCA 18. However, in Miller v Miller the High Court held that the plaintiff (injured passenger) was owed a duty of care because she withdrew from the enterprise by asking to be let out of the car and there were no reasonable steps available to her to prevent the continuation of the offence.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2011/9.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited v Laurie [2011] HCA 2

ON 9 FEBRUARY 2011, the High Court of Australia delivered British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited v Laurie [2011] HCA 2 (9 February 2011).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2011/2.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Tabet v Gett [2010] HCA 12

ON 21 APRIL 2010, the High Court of Australia delivered Tabet v Gett [2010] HCA 12 (21 April 2010).

“NEGLIGENCE – Medical negligence – Damage – Loss of chance – Appellant suffered irreversible brain damage – Respondent’s delay in providing proper treatment breached duty of care owed to appellant – Where not established on balance of probabilities that breach caused any part of brain damage – Where breach at most caused loss of less than 50% chance of better outcome – Whether law of tort recognises or should recognise loss of chance of better outcome as damage giving rise to liability in negligence – Relevance of policy considerations concerning extension of liability in medical negligence cases.

NEGLIGENCE – Medical negligence – Damage – Loss of chance – Trial judge assessed as 40% the lost chance of better outcome – Court of Appeal found evidence supported no more than 15% chance of better outcome – Whether evidence sufficient to establish loss of chance of better outcome – Whether inference could properly be drawn from evidence as to loss of chance.

WORDS AND PHRASES – “balance of probabilities”, “damage”, “gist of the action”, “loss of a chance of a better outcome”, “standard of proof”.”

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2010/12.html

The law of negligence does not allow for damages to be awarded when the breach of duty of care causes less than a 50% chance of a better outcome.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2010/12.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Wallaby Grip Ltd v QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd [2010] HCA 9

ON THIS DAY in 2010, the High Court of Australia delivered Wallaby Grip Ltd v QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd [2010] HCA 9.  A workers compensation insurer failed to discharge its onus to prove the limit of its liability under a contract of indemnity.  Absence of such evidence resulted in the indemnity being deemed unlimited.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2010/9.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088