Category Archives: LAW FIRM

Fitness First (Australia) Pty Ltd v Dubow [2011] NSWSC 605

Fitness First (Australia) Pty Ltd v Dubow [2011] NSWSC 605 (21 June 2011).

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Brown v Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCTTT 254

Brown v Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd (General) [2011] NSWCTTT 254 (16 June 2011).

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Sydney Ferries re Sydney Ferries Salaried and Senior Officers Agreement 2011

Sydney Ferries re Sydney Ferries Salaried and Senior Officers Agreement 2011 [2011] FWAA 3453 (3 June 2011)

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd v Dubow [2011] NSWSC 531

Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd v Dubow [2011] NSWSC 531 (3 June 2011)

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Duties Amendment (Senior’s Principal Place of Residence Duty Exception) Act 2011 No 6

Duties Amendment (Senior’s Principal Place of Residence Duty Exception) Act 2011 No 6

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

2011 | Equal Remuneration Case

ON THIS DAY in 2011, the Full Bench of Fair Work Australia delivered the Equal Remuneration Case [2011] FWAFB 2700 (16 May 2011).

The court found that workers of the social, community and disability services industry are underpaid compared to comparable workers in other industries.

The court sought further submissions on how to amend the Modern Award, resulting in an order made on 22 June 2012.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FWAFB/2011/2700.html

 

Jones And Harbour Radio Pty Limited v Trad [2011] NSWADTAP 19

Jones And Harbour Radio Pty Limited v Trad (EOD) [2011] NSWADTAP 19 (27 April 2011).


Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Miller v Miller [2011] HCA 9

ON 7 APRIL 2011, the High Court of Australia delivered Miller v Miller [2011] HCA 9 (7 April 2011).

A joint illegal enterprise (eg joyride) negates a duty of care (driver to passenger) thereby creating a defence of illegality on the part of the driver/insurer: see Gala v Preston [1991] HCA 18. However, in Miller v Miller the High Court held that the plaintiff (injured passenger) was owed a duty of care because she withdrew from the enterprise by asking to be let out of the car and there were no reasonable steps available to her to prevent the continuation of the offence.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2011/9.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Karam v Meredith [2011] NSWLEC 1391

Karam v Meredith [2011] NSWLEC 1391 (21 March 2011).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/2011/1391.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Holden v Smith [2011] NSWLEC 1066

Holden v Smith& Anor [2011] NSWLEC 1066 (16 March 2011).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/2011/1066.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088