The Australian Law Reform Commission has released its latest report, Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era [2014] ALRC 123.
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
The Australian Law Reform Commission has released its latest report, Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era [2014] ALRC 123.
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
ON 9 SEPTEMBER 2014, the NSW Land and Environment Court delivered Pritchard v Manly Council [2014] NSWLEC 1186.
The court upheld an appeal against a refusal by Manly Council to approve a development application for alterations and additions to a residential flat building, including a rooftop terrace at 6 Fairlight Crescent, Fairlight.
The court approved the application, subject to certain conditions.
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
ON 9 SEPTEMBER 1999, the High Court of Australia delivered Husher v Husher [1999] HCA 47; 197 CLR 138; 165 ALR 384; 73 ALJR 1414 (9 September 1999).
The injured plaintiff was in partnership with his wife but in effect was a sole tradesman with no employees. The High Court held that where an injured plaintiff operates through a corporate or partnership structure in order to minimise his or her tax liability, damages are to be assessed with reference to the full vale of the plaintiff’s earning capacity, not his or her taxable income.
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
ON 12 MARCH 2014, the Australian Privacy Principles (APP’s) replaced the National Privacy Principles and Information Privacy Principles.
The APP’s form part of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) through the passage of the Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Act 2012 (Cth).
The APP’s regulate how personal information is collected, used and handled by Australian Government Agencies and some private sector organisations.
The 13 APP’s are set out below:
1.1 The object of this principle is to ensure that APP entities manage personal information in an open and transparent way.
1.2 An APP entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to implement practices, procedures and systems relating to the entity’s functions or activities that:
1.3 An APP entity must have a clearly expressed and up to date policy (the APP privacy policy) about the management of personal information by the entity.
1.4 Without limiting subclause 1.3, the APP privacy policy of the APP entity must contain the following information:
1.5 An APP entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to make its APP privacy policy available:
Note: An APP entity will usually make its APP privacy policy available on the entity’s website.
1.6 If a person or body requests a copy of the APP privacy policy of an APP entity in a particular form, the entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to give the person or body a copy in that form.
2.1 Individuals must have the option of not identifying themselves, or of using a pseudonym, when dealing with an APP entity in relation to a particular matter.
2.2 Subclause 2.1 does not apply if, in relation to that matter:
3.1 If an APP entity is an agency, the entity must not collect personal information (other than sensitive information) unless the information is reasonably necessary for, or directly related to, one or more of the entity’s functions or activities.
3.2 If an APP entity is an organisation, the entity must not collect personal information (other than sensitive information) unless the information is reasonably necessary for one or more of the entity’s functions or activities.
3.3 An APP entity must not collect sensitive information about an individual unless:
3.4 This subclause applies in relation to sensitive information about an individual if:
Note: For permitted general situation, see section 16A. For permitted health situation, see section 16B.
3.5 An APP entity must collect personal information only by lawful and fair means.
3.6 An APP entity must collect personal information about an individual only from the individual unless:
3.7 This principle applies to the collection of personal information that is solicited by an APP entity.
4.1 If:
the entity must, within a reasonable period after receiving the information, determine whether or not the entity could have collected the information under Australian Privacy Principle 3 if the entity had solicited the information.
4.2 The APP entity may use or disclose the personal information for the purposes of making the determination under subclause 4.1.
4.3 If:
the entity must, as soon as practicable but only if it is lawful and reasonable to do so, destroy the information or ensure that the information is de-identified.
4.4 If subclause 4.3 does not apply in relation to the personal information, Australian Privacy Principles 5 to 13 apply in relation to the information as if the entity had collected the information under Australian Privacy Principle 3.
5.1 At or before the time or, if that is not practicable, as soon as practicable after, an APP entity collects personal information about an individual, the entity must take such steps (if any) as are reasonable in the circumstances:
5.2 The matters for the purposes of subclause 5.1 are as follows:
the fact that the entity so collects, or has collected, the information and the circumstances of that collection;
6.1 If an APP entity holds personal information about an individual that was collected for a particular purpose (the primary purpose), the entity must not use or disclose the information for another purpose (the secondary purpose) unless:
Note: Australian Privacy Principle 8 sets out requirements for the disclosure of personal information to a person who is not in Australia or an external Territory.
6.2 This subclause applies in relation to the use or disclosure of personal information about an individual if:
Note: For permitted general situation, see section 16A. For permitted health situation, see section 16B.
6.3 This subclause applies in relation to the disclosure of personal information about an individual by an APP entity that is an agency if:
6.4 If:
the entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to ensure that the information is de-identified before the entity discloses it in accordance with subclause 6.1 or 6.2.
6.5 If an APP entity uses or discloses personal information in accordance with paragraph 6.2(e), the entity must make a written note of the use or disclosure.
6.6 If:
this principle applies as if the entity’s primary purpose for the collection of the information were the primary purpose for which the related body corporate collected the information.
6.7 This principle does not apply to the use or disclosure by an organisation of:
7.1 If an organisation holds personal information about an individual, the organisation must not use or disclose the information for the purpose of direct marketing.
Note: An act or practice of an agency may be treated as an act or practice of an organisation, see section 7A.
7.2 Despite subclause 7.1, an organisation may use or disclose personal information (other than sensitive information) about an individual for the purpose of direct marketing if:
7.3 Despite subclause 7.1, an organisation may use or disclose personal information (other than sensitive information) about an individual for the purpose of direct marketing if:
7.4 Despite subclause 7.1, an organisation may use or disclose sensitive information about an individual for the purpose of direct marketing if the individual has consented to the use or disclosure of the information for that purpose.
7.5 Despite subclause 7.1, an organisation may use or disclose personal information for the purpose of direct marketing if:
7.6 If an organisation (the first organisation) uses or discloses personal information about an individual:
the individual may:
7.7 If an individual makes a request under subclause 7.6, the first organisation must not charge the individual for the making of, or to give effect to, the request and:
7.8 This principle does not apply to the extent that any of the following apply:
8.1 Before an APP entity discloses personal information about an individual to a person (the overseas recipient):
the entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to ensure that the overseas recipient does not breach the Australian Privacy Principles (other than Australian Privacy Principle 1) in relation to the information.
Note: In certain circumstances, an act done, or a practice engaged in, by the overseas recipient is taken, under section 16C, to have been done, or engaged in, by the APP entity and to be a breach of the Australian Privacy Principles.
8.2 Subclause 8.1 does not apply to the disclosure of personal information about an individual by an APP entity to the overseas recipient if:
Note: For permitted general situation, see section 16A.
9.1 An organisation must not adopt a government related identifier of an individual as its own identifier of the individual unless:
Note: An act or practice of an agency may be treated as an act or practice of an organisation, see section 7A.
9.2 An organisation must not use or disclose a government related identifier of an individual unless:
Note 1: An act or practice of an agency may be treated as an act or practice of an organisation, see section 7A.
Note 2: For permitted general situation, see section 16A.
9.3 This subclause applies in relation to the adoption, use or disclosure by an organisation of a government related identifier of an individual if:
Note: There are prerequisites that must be satisfied before the matters mentioned in this subclause are prescribed, see subsections 100(2) and (3).
10.1 An APP entity must take such steps (if any) as are reasonable in the circumstances to ensure that the personal information that the entity collects is accurate, up-to-date and complete.
10.2 An APP entity must take such steps (if any) as are reasonable in the circumstances to ensure that the personal information that the entity uses or discloses is, having regard to the purpose of the use or disclosure, accurate, up-to-date, complete and relevant.
11.1 If an APP entity holds personal information, the entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to protect the information:
11.2 If:
the entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to destroy the information or to ensure that the information is de-identified.
12.1 If an APP entity holds personal information about an individual, the entity must, on request by the individual, give the individual access to the information.
12.2 If:
then, despite subclause 12.1, the entity is not required to give access to the extent that the entity is required or authorised to refuse to give access.
12.3 If the APP entity is an organisation then, despite subclause 12.1, the entity is not required to give the individual access to the personal information to the extent that:
12.4 The APP entity must:
12.5 If the APP entity refuses:
12.6 Without limiting subclause 12.5, access may be given through the use of a mutually agreed intermediary.
12.7 If the APP entity is an agency, the entity must not charge the individual for the making of the request or for giving access to the personal information.
12.8 If:
the charge must not be excessive and must not apply to the making of the request.
12.9 If the APP entity refuses to give access to the personal information because of subclause 12.2 or 12.3, or to give access in the manner requested by the individual, the entity must give the individual a written notice that sets out:
12.10 If the APP entity refuses to give access to the personal information because of paragraph 12.3(j), the reasons for the refusal may include an explanation for the commercially sensitive decision.
Correction
13.1 If:
the entity must take such steps (if any) as are reasonable in the circumstances to correct that information to ensure that, having regard to the purpose for which it is held, the information is accurate, up to date, complete, relevant and not misleading.
13.2 If:
the entity must take such steps (if any) as are reasonable in the circumstances to give that notification unless it is impracticable or unlawful to do so.
13.3 If the APP entity refuses to correct the personal information as requested by the individual, the entity must give the individual a written notice that sets out:
13.4 If:
the entity must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to associate the statement in such a way that will make the statement apparent to users of the information.
13.5 If a request is made under subclause 13.1 or 13.4, the APP entity:
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
ON 8 SEPTEMBER 1988, the High Court of Australia delivered Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd [1988] HCA 44; (1988) 165 CLR 107 (8 September 1988).
The proprietor of a building site (Blue Circle Cement) took out an insurance policy with Trident General Insurance which promised to indemnify the assured who it defined as Blue Circle Cement but also “all its subsidiary, associated and related Companies, all Contractors and Sub-Contractors and/or Suppliers”.
A contractor (McNeice) who incurred a legal liability (a judgment in favour of an injured worker) was held to be covered although not a party to the policy.
A non-party beneficiary under an insurance policy has a right at common law for benefits promised under the policy. The decision creates an exception to the privity of contract rule.
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
ON 8 SEPTEMBER 1993, the Supreme Court of NSW delivered Independent Commission Against Corruption v Cornwall (1993) 38 NSWLR 207.
Journalist Deborah Cornwall was found guilty of contempt for not disclosing the names of unnamed police officers who told her that underworld figure Arthur “Neddy” Smith had been a police informer.
Ms Cornwall received a two month suspended sentence and 90 hours of community service.
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
ON 8 SEPTEMBER 2004, the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal delivered Application by the Attorney General under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act for a Guideline Judgment Concerning the Offence of High Range Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol Under Section 9(4) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (No. 3 of 2002) [2004] NSWCCA 303.
The NSW Attorney General made an application to the Court of Criminal Appeal seeking a guideline judgment for sentencing of offenders convicted of high range drink driving. The Attorney General held a concern that too many offenders were receiving leniency by way of s10 orders dismissing or conditionally discharging the offence without a conviction being recorded.
The guideline identifies:
The actual guideline is as follows:
(1) An ordinary case of the offence of high range PCA is one where:
(i) the offender drove to avoid personal inconvenience or because the offender did not believe that he or she was sufficiently affected by alcohol;
(ii) the offender was detected by a random breath test;
(iii) the offender has prior good character;
(iv) the offender has nil, or a minor, traffic record;
(v) the offender’s licence was suspended on detection;
(vi) the offender pleaded guilty;
(vii) there is little or no risk of re-offending;
(viii) the offender would be significantly inconvenienced by loss of licence.
(2) In an ordinary case of an offence of high range PCA:
(i) an order under s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act will rarely be appropriate;
(ii) a conviction cannot be avoided only because the offender has attended, or will attend, a driver’s education or awareness course;
(iii) the automatic disqualification period will be appropriate unless there is a good reason to reduce the period of disqualification:
(iv) a good reason under (iii) may include:
(a) the nature of the offender’s employment;
(b) the absence of any viable alternative transport;
(c) sickness or infirmity of the offender or another person.
(3) In an ordinary case of a second or subsequent high range PCA offence:
(i) an order under s 9 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act will rarely be appropriate;
(ii) an order under s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act would very rarely be appropriate;
(iii) where the prior offence was a high range PCA, any sentence of less severity than a community service order would generally be inappropriate.
(4) The moral culpability of a high range PCA offender is increased by:
(i) the degree of intoxication above 0.15;
(ii) erratic or aggressive driving;
(iii) a collision between the vehicle and any other object;
(iv) competitive driving or showing off;
(v) the length of the journey at which others are exposed to risk;
(vi) the number of persons actually put at risk by the driving.
(5) In a case where the moral culpability of a high range PCA offender is increased:
(i) an order under s 9 or s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Pro¬cedure) Act would very rarely be appropriate;
(ii) where a number of factors of aggravation are present to a significant degree, a sentence of any less severity than impris¬onment of some kind, including a suspended sentence, would generally be inappropriate.
(6) In a case where the moral culpability of the offender of a second or subsequent high range PCA offence is increased:
(i) a sentence of any less severity than imprisonment of some kind would generally be inappropriate;
(ii) where any number of aggravating factors are present to a significant degree or where the prior offence is a high range PCA offence, a sentence of less severity than full-time imprisonment would generally be inappropriate
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
Lawyers Weekly and Money Management report that a number of plaintiff law firms, including Slater and Gordon, are in discussions with the Commonwealth Bank to be engaged as independent customer advocates in its Open Advice Review Program.
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
Lawyers Weekly have announced that they have partnered with Bulletpoints, a free online service that helps lawyers find CPD/CLE/MCLE events from a wide range of providers.