Category Archives: LAW FIRM

O’Callaghan v Loder [1983] 3 NSWLR 89

ON 30 SEPTEMBER 1983, the Supreme Court of NSW delivered O’Callaghan v Loder [1983] 3 NSWLR 89; [1984] EOC 92-023; (1983) 5 IR 320.

O’Callaghan was a junior lift attendant who sued the Commissioner for Main Roads for sex discrimination alleging sexual harassment.

O’Callaghan was unsuccessful in proving her allegations.

This was Australia’s first judicial decision on sex discrimination involving sexual harassment and is an authority that sexual harassment is a form sex discrimination.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14

ON 12 MAY 1983, the High Court of Australia delivered Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447 (12 May 1983).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1983/14.html

“Equity – Mortgage and guarantee – Right to set aside – Unusual transactions between bank and customer – Bank’s failure to disclose to mortgagor guarantor – Misrepresentation.

Guarantee – Guarantor under disability – Dealing with bank – Bank knowing of disability – Unconscionable bargain – Onus of proof – Whether transaction should be set aside unconditionally.”

An elderly Italian migrant couple had mortgaged land they owned as a guarantee for a loan from the bank to their son’s business. The business then went into liquidation and the bank demanded payment of the guarantee and then attempted to exercise a power of sale over the land.

The Amadios argued that the guarantee and mortgage should set aside as:

  • they spoke limited English;
  • they did not receive independent advice and were not advised to do so;
  • they were not aware of their son’s financial situation, although the bank was; and
  • they mistakenly believed that the liability was limited to $50,000.

The court held that the mortgage and guarantee must be set aside as it was unconscionable for the bank to enter into those transactions in circumstances where the bank through it’s superior bargaining power had gained an unconscientious advantage to the detriment of the Amadios who suffered a special disability.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Fencott v Muller [1983] HCA 12

Fencott v Muller [1983] HCA 12; (1983) 152 CLR 570 (28 April 1983).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/152clr570.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Pyneboard Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission [1983] HCA 9

ON 18 MARCH 1983, the High Court of Australia delivered Pyneboard Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission [1983] HCA 9; (1983) 152 CLR 328 (18 March 1983).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/152clr328.html

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Mullane v Mullane [1983] HCA 4

Mullane v Mullane [1983] HCA 4; (1983) 158 CLR 436 (23 February 1983).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/158clr436.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Taylor v Johnson [1983] HCA 5

ON THIS DAY in 1983, the High Court of Australia delivered Taylor v Johnson [1983] HCA 5; (1983) 151 CLR 422 (23 February 1983)

Per Mason ACJ, Murphy and Deane JJ “…a party who has entered into a written contract under a serious mistake about its contents in relation to a fundamental term will be entitled in equity to an order rescinding the contract if the other party is aware that circumstances exist which indicate that the first party is entering the contract under some serious mistake or misapprehension about either the content or subject matter of that term and deliberately sets out to ensure that the first party does not become aware of the existence of his mistake or misapprehension.” (at 342).

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

1982 | Random breath testing

ON THIS DAY in 1982, random breath testing was introduced into NSW through the commencement of the substantive parts of the Motor Traffic (Road Safety) Amendment Act 1982.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/num_act/mtsaa1982n123364

1982 | Constiution of China

ON 4 DECEMBER 1982, the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China was adopted.

http://english.gov.cn/2005-08/05/content_20813.htm

Lawyer
Peter O’Grady
BA, LLB, Grad Cert Leg Prac, Acc Spec Lawyer

Neal v R

ON 24 SEPTEMBER 1982, the High Court of Australia delivered Neal v R [1982] HCA 55; (1982) 149 CLR 305 (24 September 1982).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1982/55.html

The ethnic or other background of an offender may be a material fact to be taken into account in sentencing.

Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 44

Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 44; (1982) 149 CLR 191 (11 August 1982).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/149clr191.html

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088