Category Archives: Commercial Law

Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14

ON 12 MAY 1983, the High Court of Australia delivered Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447 (12 May 1983).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1983/14.html

“Equity – Mortgage and guarantee – Right to set aside – Unusual transactions between bank and customer – Bank’s failure to disclose to mortgagor guarantor – Misrepresentation.

Guarantee – Guarantor under disability – Dealing with bank – Bank knowing of disability – Unconscionable bargain – Onus of proof – Whether transaction should be set aside unconditionally.”

An elderly Italian migrant couple had mortgaged land they owned as a guarantee for a loan from the bank to their son’s business. The business then went into liquidation and the bank demanded payment of the guarantee and then attempted to exercise a power of sale over the land.

The Amadios argued that the guarantee and mortgage should set aside as:

  • they spoke limited English;
  • they did not receive independent advice and were not advised to do so;
  • they were not aware of their son’s financial situation, although the bank was; and
  • they mistakenly believed that the liability was limited to $50,000.

The court held that the mortgage and guarantee must be set aside as it was unconscionable for the bank to enter into those transactions in circumstances where the bank through it’s superior bargaining power had gained an unconscientious advantage to the detriment of the Amadios who suffered a special disability.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd [1972] 2 WLR 1051

Ashington Piggeries v Christopher Hill Ltd [1971] 2 WLR 1051; [1972] AC 441 (24 February 1971)

Click to access Ashington%20Piggeries.pdf

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

Luna Park (NSW) Ltd v Tramways Advertising Pty Ltd [1938] HCA 66

ON 23 DECEMBER 1938, the High Court of Australia delivered Luna Park (NSW) Ltd v Tramways Advertising Pty Ltd [1938] HCA 66; (1938) 61 CLR 286 (23 December 1938).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1938/66.html

Only nominal damages should be awarded when a breach of contract causes no identifiable loss. The right to nominal damages follows as “a matter of course”.

A term of a contract will be regarded as a condition if it goes to the very substance of the contract.

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

Australian Knitting Mills Ltd v Grant [1933] HCA 35

ON 18 AUGUST 1933, the High Court of Australia delivered Australian Knitting Mills Ltd v Grant [1933] HCA 35; (1933) 50 CLR 387 (18 August 1933).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1933/35.html

Per Dixon J at 418:

‘The condition that goods are of merchantable quality requires that they should be in such an actual state that a buyer fully acquainted with the facts and, therefore, knowing what hidden defects exist and not being limited to their apparent condition would buy them without abatement of the price obtainable for such goods if in reasonably sound order and condition and without special terms.”

Lawyers

Sydney, Australia

1300 00 2088

1894 | Sale of Goods Act

ON THIS DAY in 1894, the Parliament of the United Kingdom enacted the Sale of Goods Act 1893. New South Wales enacted its own Act in 1923.