Chambers v Mosman MC [2005] NSWLEC 612 (27 October 2005).
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/2005/612.html
1300 00 2088
All posts by Legal Helpdesk Lawyers
Chambers v Mosman MC
Chambers v Mosman MC [2005] NSWLEC 612 (27 October 2005).
CSR Limited v Eddy [2005] HCA 64
ON 21 OCTOBER 2005, the High Court of Australia delivered CSR Limited v Eddy [2005] HCA 64; (2005) 80 ALJR 59 (21 October 2005).
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/64.html
The High Court overruled the NSW Court of Appeal decision of Sullivan v Gordon, holding that a person who claims damages for personal injuries cannot claim special damages for the loss of capacity to care for a disabled family member that they would have cared for had they not been injured.
Sydney, Australia
1300 00 2088
2005 | Iraqi Constiution
ON 15 OCTOBER 2005, Iraq adopted it’s new constitution.
Click to access IraqiConstitution.pdf
BA, LLB, Grad Cert Leg Prac, Acc Spec Lawyer
Bed Bath n’Table Pty Ltd v Stonnington CC [2005] VCAT 2093
Sydney Regional Environmental Plan (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005 (NSW)
Malaysian Airline Systems Berhad v Krum [2005] VSCA 232
Malaysian Airline Systems Berhad v Krum [2005] VSCA 232 (20 September 2005).
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/vic/VSCA/2005/232.html
1300 00 2088
Muller v Mosman Municipal Council
Muller v Mosman Municipal Council [2005] NSWLEC 482 (7 September 2005).
30A Kardinia Road, Clifton Gardens NSW 2088
Muller v Mosman Municipal Council [2005] NSWLEC 482 (7 September 2005).
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/2005/482.html
1300 00 2088
APLA Limited v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) [2005] HCA 44
ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2005, the High Court of Australia delivered APLA Limited v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) [2005] HCA 44; 224 CLR 322; 79 ALJR 1620; 219 ALR 403 (1 September 2005).
The plaintiffs brought proceedings challenging the constitutional validity of regulations made under Part 14 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) banning lawyers from advertising their services for personal injury claims.
Clause 139 provided:
“(1) A barrister or solicitor must not publish or cause or permit to be published an advertisement that includes any reference to or depiction of any of the following:
(a) personal injury,
(b) any circumstance in which personal injury might occur, or any activity, event or circumstance that suggests or could suggest the possibility of personal injury, or any connection to or association with personal injury or a cause of personal injury,
(c) a personal injury legal service (that is, any legal service that relates to recovery of money, or any entitlement to recover money, in respect of personal injury).
Maximum penalty: 10 penalty units.
(2) A contravention of this clause by a barrister or solicitor is declared to be professional misconduct.”
The plaintiffs argued that the regulations infringe various provisions of the Constitution including the guarantee of freedom of communication on political matters, free trade and the rule of law.
The High Court ruled that the regulations are constitutionally valid.
1300 00 2088
Legal Helpdesk Lawyers 